The Second Continental Congress called for a convention for the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation which, according to the Articles, could not be revised without confirmation by the legislatures of every state. What actually happened was a different form of government was created with an entirely new constitution which was not confirmed by all of the states. In other words, the country began functioning on a broken contract.
​

The Second Continental Congress called for a convention wherein recommendations for revising the Articles of Confederation would be made and submitted to the Congress and to the States, respectively. Why? Because the States were sovereign. The United States of America was a confederation of States, not a respublic.
​

....What specifically did the Second Continental Congress call for?

Natural Date: 546

The U.S. Consitution is not and has never been the law of the land. It is a territorial document, not a land document. It is a set of bylaws establishing the corporate structure of the United States. No metes, bounds, natural landmarks nor earth elements are discussed in the U.S. Constitution. So what makes people think it relates to the land? Americans have been lied to — handed a cow pie and told it was dessert.

The closest America has ever come to a land consitution is the Articles of Confederation — until the COURT OF AGES Law of the Land Handbook. And, of course, the COURT OF AGES is We the People. The U.S. government has never and was never intended to work for We the People, despite the UNMITIGATED FACT THAT THE PEOPLE HOLD ALL OF THE TRUE POWER.

Natural Date: 544

If you gathered from the video in my last post that members of the U.S. Congress are clueless as to how things are actually operating in government and politics, you would be correct. Members who catch on and speak out about it are persecuted. U.S. House member from Georgia (2005–2007), Cynthia McKinney, is an example of this. She now lives and works in Bangladesh due to threats on her life after refusing to participate in the fraud and speaking out about it. I would add that U.S. presidents are also clueless (until they are filled in to whatever level is necessary in order to get them to do what those in charge want them to do).

So, needless to say, I am unimpressed with political protests, appeals to Congress or connections with people in politics and government. What is called for now is beyond all of that and requires APPROPRIATE action by We the People.

Natural Date: 543

...because many are deemed likely to honor their oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, and doing so is an act of insurrection.

How can that be? The Consitution was suspended by Lincoln in 1863 when he enacted the Lieber Code, now known as the Hague Conventions, somtimes called International Law or International Humanitarian Law.

Didn’t that end when the Civil War ended? No, because the Civil War never ended. Sure, Lee surrendered to Grant because his troops were surrounded, but their truce only ended the shooting. The Confederate Government never surrendered and no treaty was ever signed. Here is a link in case you find that impossible to believe: https://www.nps.gov/apco/faqs.htm

But don’t the courts still rule according to the Constitution? Many times, yes, but often their rulings are ignored. Take, for example, when Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and the Federal District Court of Maryland issued a ruling saying he had no authority to do so. Lincoln simply ignored the ruling. 

The Civil War left our country with corporate bylaws instead of a Constitution and financially dependent on foreign banking interests. In other words, the United States was turned over to the Vatican through the banking elite. U.S. Presidents now function as theocratic monarchs ruling by decree (executive orders). Activism by We the People for the return of the U.S. Constitution threatens this set-up and is viewed as insurrection. 

Please do your own research and verify all this for yourself.